Back to news
September 7, 2026

Curaçao vs Anjouan Gaming License 2026: Cost, Time & Requirements

Curaçao vs Anjouan Gaming License 2026: Cost, Time, Requirements & Which Is Better?

Curaçao and Anjouan are two of the most frequently compared gaming jurisdictions for international online casino, sportsbook and iGaming projects.

Both can support international operations, but they sit at very different points in the licensing market.

Anjouan is generally faster and less expensive to enter. Curaçao has a substantially higher regulatory and operating cost, but offers a more developed licensing framework and may be better suited to operators planning a larger or more established international business.

The right choice therefore depends on more than the headline licence fee.

Operators should compare the target markets, company structure, banking and payment strategy, game and platform suppliers, compliance resources, launch budget and long-term plans before selecting either jurisdiction.

This guide compares the Curaçao Gaming License and Anjouan Gaming License in 2026 across the factors that matter most to an actual operating business.

Curaçao vs Anjouan: Quick Comparison

Factor Curaçao Anjouan
Regulator Curaçao Gaming Authority Anjouan Gaming Authority
Typical Positioning Growing and established international operators Startups and cost-sensitive international operators
Annual Regulatory Fee €47,450 for B2C €17,828
Application Fee €4,592 plus applicable due diligence fees Included within the current licence issuance structure
Typical Licensing Timeline Approximately 4–6 months Approximately 3–4 weeks
B2C Licence Yes Yes
B2B Licence Yes Yes
Casino Yes Yes
Sportsbook Yes Yes
Crypto-Compatible Possible subject to compliance and operating model Yes, subject to AML and compliance controls
Local Presence More substantial local and corporate requirements No comparable local presence requirement for the standard structure
Compliance Burden Higher Lower, but AML/KYC and ongoing compliance still apply
Best For Operators prioritising scalability and a more developed regulatory framework Startups prioritising speed and lower initial cost

If you are comparing more than these two jurisdictions, see our iGaming License Comparison and Gaming License Pricing pages.

Curaçao Gaming License in 2026

Curaçao has changed significantly from the jurisdiction many operators remember from the historical master-license and sublicense model.

Under the current framework, operators apply directly for licensing and are supervised by the Curaçao Gaming Authority.

The regulatory model is now more formal and places greater emphasis on ownership transparency, suitability, AML, responsible gaming, technical standards and ongoing supervision.

This has increased both the regulatory cost and the amount of preparation required before an operator can launch.

For a full overview of the licensing process, company structure and requirements, read our Curaçao Gaming Licence 2026 Complete Guide .

Anjouan Gaming License in 2026

Anjouan occupies a different position in the market.

It is commonly considered by startups and international operators that want to launch without the cost and local operating burden associated with more demanding jurisdictions.

The Anjouan Gaming Authority currently issues both B2C operator licences and B2B service provider licences.

Permitted activities may include online casino, sports betting, poker, bingo, prediction markets, blockchain-based gaming and cryptocurrency-enabled gaming, subject to the conditions attached to the licence.

See our Anjouan Gaming Licence 2026 Complete Guide for the full application and operating structure.

Curaçao vs Anjouan License Cost

Cost is the clearest difference between the two jurisdictions.

The official annual B2C regulatory cost in Curaçao is currently €47,450.

The current Anjouan annual licence fee is €17,828.

Regulatory Cost Curaçao Anjouan
Application / Issuance €4,592 application fee €17,828 licence issuance
Annual / Renewal Fee €47,450 €17,828
Additional Due Diligence UBO and interest-holder fees may apply Depends on the application and additional regulatory services
Company and Operating Structure Additional Additional

The difference becomes even larger when the complete operating structure is considered.

Curaçao generally requires a more substantial corporate and compliance setup, while Anjouan can normally be structured with lower annual overhead.

For a detailed breakdown of the Curaçao fees, read Curaçao Gaming License Cost 2026 .

You can also compare current package pricing for both jurisdictions on our iGaming License Pricing page.

First-Year Budget: Curaçao vs Anjouan

The licence fee should never be treated as the complete cost of launching an online gaming business.

Operators should also budget for company incorporation, corporate services, compliance, technical preparation, payment onboarding, software, game content and ongoing administration.

Budget Area Curaçao Anjouan
Regulatory Fees Higher Lower
Company Setup Required Required operating company structure
Local Corporate Costs Higher Generally lower
Compliance Resources Higher Moderate
Technical Preparation More extensive Project-dependent
Overall Entry Cost Higher Lower

This is why Anjouan is often attractive to operators launching an MVP or entering the market with a limited initial budget.

Curaçao is more likely to make sense when the business is sufficiently funded to support the higher cost and expects to benefit from the jurisdiction over a longer operating period.

Curaçao vs Anjouan Licensing Timeline

Speed is another major difference.

Anjouan is generally one of the faster international licensing options. A well-prepared application may be completed in approximately 3–4 weeks.

Curaçao should be planned over a much longer period.

A realistic working estimate for a complete Curaçao licensing project is approximately 4–6 months, depending on the applicant, documentation, ownership structure, technical readiness and regulatory review.

Stage Curaçao Anjouan
Company Preparation Required before or alongside licensing Can be arranged as part of the project
Application Preparation More extensive More streamlined
Regulatory Review Several months Several weeks
Typical Total Timeline 4–6 months 3–4 weeks

Company Structure

Curaçao

A Curaçao licence is tied to a more substantial local corporate structure.

The applicant must establish and maintain an appropriate company and satisfy the applicable corporate, governance and regulatory requirements.

Local substance, management, compliance and administrative arrangements should therefore be built into the budget from the start.

Anjouan

Anjouan offers greater flexibility in the corporate structure used for the operating business.

Many international operators combine the licence with an offshore operating company selected according to ownership, banking, payment and tax considerations.

Costa Rica is one structure commonly considered for Anjouan projects.

For a detailed comparison of company options, read: Best Company for an Anjouan Gaming License .

Compliance Requirements

Neither licence should be treated as a way to operate without compliance.

Both jurisdictions require the operator to understand its customers, monitor financial activity, manage sanctions exposure and operate according to responsible-gaming and anti-money-laundering requirements.

The practical difference is the depth of the regulatory framework and the level of ongoing supervision.

Curaçao generally requires a more formal compliance structure and more extensive ongoing regulatory interaction.

Anjouan offers a lighter operating framework, but this does not remove the need for:

  • AML and CFT policies;
  • customer due diligence and KYC;
  • sanctions screening;
  • transaction monitoring;
  • responsible-gaming controls;
  • ownership and source-of-funds transparency;
  • ongoing compliance with licence conditions.

Banking and Payment Providers

A gaming licence does not automatically guarantee access to a bank account or payment processing.

Every bank, EMI, acquirer and PSP applies its own onboarding policy.

In practice, Curaçao may provide stronger recognition with some international counterparties because of its longer market history and more developed regulatory structure.

Anjouan can still work with a range of gaming-focused payment providers, but acceptance varies more significantly by provider and target market.

For some Anjouan operators, a separate payment-company structure may help improve access to European payment infrastructure.

See: Why Many Anjouan Gaming Operators Use a Cyprus Payment Agent .

Game Suppliers and Platform Acceptance

Operators should never choose a gaming licence before checking whether the planned platform, sportsbook provider and game studios will accept that jurisdiction.

Supplier policies are commercial decisions and can differ substantially.

Curaçao is generally familiar to most established iGaming suppliers.

Anjouan is also supported by a growing number of platforms and game providers, but supplier acceptance should be confirmed before the licence application begins.

This is especially important if the business model depends on a particular live-casino studio, sportsbook provider or major game aggregator.

Technical Certification

The technical requirements also differ depending on the jurisdiction and the operator's platform model.

Operators using proprietary games, RNG technology or critical gaming systems may need testing or certification by a recognised laboratory.

Projects relying entirely on established third-party platform and game suppliers may be able to use existing technical certificates where accepted.

For more information, see our GLI Certification for Online Casinos .

Curaçao vs Anjouan for Online Casinos

For an online casino, the choice usually comes down to launch strategy.

Anjouan can be attractive where the main goals are:

  • launching quickly;
  • keeping the initial licensing budget low;
  • testing a new casino brand;
  • operating internationally outside heavily locally regulated markets;
  • building an MVP before moving to a more expensive jurisdiction.

Curaçao may be more suitable where the operator:

  • has a larger launch budget;
  • expects substantial transaction volumes;
  • needs broader counterparty recognition;
  • is building a long-term international brand;
  • can support a more demanding compliance structure.

Curaçao vs Anjouan for Sportsbooks

Both jurisdictions can support sportsbook businesses.

The same commercial considerations apply: the sportsbook provider, odds supplier, payment partners and target markets should all be checked before the licensing structure is selected.

A startup sportsbook testing demand may favour Anjouan because of the lower entry cost and shorter licensing timeline.

A funded operator planning a larger international sportsbook may prefer Curaçao if the higher regulatory cost fits the business model.

Curaçao vs Anjouan for B2B iGaming Companies

Both jurisdictions support B2B licensing models.

This can be relevant to:

  • gaming platform providers;
  • game aggregators;
  • software suppliers;
  • critical gaming technology providers;
  • other businesses supplying services to licensed operators.

Anjouan offers a dedicated B2B service provider licence, while Curaçao also operates a supplier licensing framework.

For a B2B business, the decision should be driven primarily by customer requirements.

A B2B licence has limited commercial value if the target operators, platforms or regulated counterparties do not recognise it.

Curaçao vs Anjouan for Crypto Casinos

Both jurisdictions can accommodate cryptocurrency-related gaming models, but crypto does not remove AML obligations.

Operators should still consider:

  • wallet screening;
  • source-of-funds controls;
  • sanctions exposure;
  • transaction monitoring;
  • fiat-to-crypto conversion;
  • treasury management;
  • payment-provider acceptance.

Anjouan can be attractive to crypto-focused startups because the lower regulatory cost makes it easier to test the business model.

A larger crypto operator may still prefer Curaçao where the broader structure fits its banking, supplier and investor requirements.

Restricted Countries and Target Markets

This is one of the areas where operators need to be particularly careful.

A gaming licence does not provide automatic legal access to every country in the world.

The operator must assess the gambling laws of each target market and determine whether a local licence is required, whether offshore operators are prohibited and whether advertising or player solicitation is restricted.

The Anjouan Gaming Authority states that an Anjouan licence does not override the laws of the jurisdictions in which an operator accepts players. Operators remain responsible for compliance with local target-market rules.

The same practical principle applies when operating under Curaçao: holding a Curaçao licence does not override the domestic licensing laws of another country.

Taxes: Curaçao vs Anjouan

Gaming licence fees and corporate taxation should be analysed separately.

Anjouan is generally marketed with a 0% gaming tax under the licence structure.

Curaçao is not best described simply as a zero-tax gaming jurisdiction. The corporate tax position depends on the company's activities, structure and applicable territorial tax rules.

Operators should therefore review the tax structure of the actual company rather than assuming that the regulator's gaming fee determines the complete tax exposure.

Which Licence Is Better for a Startup?

For many early-stage operators, Anjouan is the more practical starting point.

The reason is straightforward: the licence costs less, the process is faster and the corporate structure can normally be operated with lower initial overhead.

That does not mean Anjouan is automatically better.

A well-funded startup with demanding banking, investor or supplier requirements may find that Curaçao provides a better long-term structure despite the higher entry cost.

For a broader startup comparison, see: Best iGaming License for Startups in 2026 .

When Curaçao Makes More Sense

Curaçao may be the stronger option when:

  • the project is adequately funded;
  • the operator expects significant transaction volume;
  • supplier and PSP recognition is a major consideration;
  • the business is intended to operate for the long term;
  • the company can maintain a more formal compliance framework;
  • the owners prefer a more developed international regulatory regime.

When Anjouan Makes More Sense

Anjouan may be the better fit when:

  • speed to market is important;
  • the licensing budget is limited;
  • the operator is launching an MVP;
  • the project is still validating product-market fit;
  • the target suppliers and payment providers accept the licence;
  • the business does not require a Tier-1 regulatory structure from day one.

Curaçao vs Anjouan: Which One Should You Choose?

There is no universal winner.

For a small or early-stage international operator, Anjouan often provides the more efficient route to launch.

For a larger operator with sufficient capital and a longer-term international strategy, Curaçao may justify the additional cost.

The final decision should be based on the complete operating model:

  • target markets;
  • expected GGR and transaction volume;
  • available licensing budget;
  • ownership structure;
  • banking and PSP requirements;
  • game and platform suppliers;
  • crypto or fiat payment model;
  • compliance resources;
  • expected growth over the next two to three years.

A licence that is cheaper on day one can become expensive if the operator later has to restructure the company, change payment providers or re-license to satisfy commercial counterparties.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Anjouan cheaper than Curaçao?

Yes. The current Anjouan annual licence fee is €17,828, while the official annual B2C regulatory fees in Curaçao total €47,450. The complete operating cost in both jurisdictions is higher once company, compliance and professional expenses are included.

Is Anjouan faster than Curaçao?

Generally yes. An Anjouan application may be completed in approximately 3–4 weeks when the company and documentation are ready. A Curaçao project should normally be planned over approximately 4–6 months.

Is Curaçao more reputable than Anjouan?

Curaçao has a longer history in international iGaming and operates a more developed regulatory framework. This may provide stronger recognition with some banks, PSPs and suppliers. However, acceptance is always counterparty-specific and should be confirmed before applying.

Can I run an online casino with an Anjouan licence?

Yes. The Anjouan B2C licence can cover online casino operations, subject to the licence conditions and the laws of the markets in which players are accepted.

Can I run a sportsbook with an Anjouan licence?

Yes. Sports betting is among the activities that may be covered by an Anjouan B2C licence.

Does Anjouan offer a B2B licence?

Yes. The Anjouan Gaming Authority offers a B2B service provider licence for relevant gaming suppliers and technology providers.

Does Curaçao offer a B2B licence?

Yes. Curaçao operates a supplier licensing framework for relevant B2B gaming activities.

Which licence is better for a new online casino?

Anjouan is often more practical for a startup because of its lower cost and faster licensing process. Curaçao may be more suitable for a better-funded operator that prioritises long-term regulatory positioning and broader commercial recognition.

Can I target every country with Curaçao or Anjouan?

No. Neither licence overrides the gambling laws of the player's country. Operators must assess each target market individually and block jurisdictions where local law prohibits the activity or requires a domestic licence.

Can I accept cryptocurrency under Curaçao or Anjouan?

Cryptocurrency-based operations may be possible under both structures, but operators still need appropriate AML, sanctions, wallet-monitoring and source-of-funds controls.

Need Help Choosing Between Curaçao and Anjouan?

The most useful comparison is not simply €47,450 versus €17,828.

We normally assess the complete project: target countries, expected volumes, company structure, platform and games, banking, payment providers, crypto requirements, compliance resources and the operator's longer-term licensing strategy.

Review the Curaçao Gaming License and Anjouan Gaming License service pages, compare current costs on our iGaming License Pricing page, or contact us for a licensing assessment.

Curaçao vs Anjouan Gaming License 2026: Cost, Time & Requirements | iGaming Licenses Hub